<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>djehuti.com - The Armory &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djehuti.com/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djehuti.com</link>
	<description>Mac and Music geekery. Not much heraldry talk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:05:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do Music Artists Fare Better in a World With Illegal File-Sharing?</title>
		<link>http://www.djehuti.com/2009/11/20/do-music-artists-fare-better-in-a-world-with-illegal-file-sharing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.djehuti.com/2009/11/20/do-music-artists-fare-better-in-a-world-with-illegal-file-sharing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djehuti.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, John Gruber at Daring Fireball published a note on his &#8220;linked list&#8221; items called Do Music Artists Fare Better in a World With Illegal File-Sharing? He said, The only group that is making less revenue is the record labels. Reading the linked article and its associated chart, it does seem that this would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, John Gruber at <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a> published a note on his &#8220;linked list&#8221;
items called <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/11/13/music-industry">Do Music Artists Fare Better in a World With Illegal File-Sharing?</a></p>

<p>He said,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The only group that is making less revenue is the record labels.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Reading <a href="http://labs.timesonline.co.uk/blog/2009/11/12/do-music-artists-do-better-in-a-world-with-illegal-file-sharing/">the linked article</a> and its associated chart, it does seem that
this would be true, as nearly all of the revenue streams on that chart are rising,
and the only one that&#8217;s falling significantly is for labels.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.negativland.com/albini.html">We&#8217;ve all heard</a> about the horrible business practices of the record
labels, and we all know the great <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/arts/11iht-radiohead.1.7846728.html">success stories</a> about how artists
are now bypassing record labels and releasing directly to fans. Great!
Let&#8217;s just do away with the labels then, let digital downloads be free,
and everybody wins.</p>

<p>There&#8217;s just this one little problem: the revenue lines on the graph are only
labeled right for the old music industry business models.</p>

<p>In the brave new world where artists self-release, or
<a href="http://www.nepenthemusic.com/">run</a>
<a href="http://www.hypnos.com/">their</a>
<a href="http://robertrich.com/">own</a>
<a href="http://www.lotuspike.com/">micro-labels</a>,
that big ol&#8217; declining line at the top labeled &#8220;Recorded revenue (to labels)&#8221;
should really say &#8220;Recorded revenue (to artists)&#8221;.</p>

<p>&#8220;No problem,&#8221; you might say. &#8220;They can make up that revenue in live performance revenues.&#8221;</p>

<p>Hmm. A couple of problems with that.</p>

<p>First, <a href="http://www.lotuspike.com/artists_bencox.php">some artists</a> don&#8217;t tend to perform much. Suck it up and play live,
I guess is the answer to that.
(Or just resign ourselves to music being a money-losing hobby.)</p>

<p>Second, other artists might perform, but find it hard to turn a profit doing it.
Last weekend, I <a href="https://twitter.com/djehuti/status/5719373264">tweeted</a>:</p>

<p><center>
<img src="http://www.djehuti.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/arc-tweet.png" alt="Tweet" />
</center></p>

<p>It was <a href="http://thegatherings.org/82gather.html">a great show</a>, and I believe it was sold out. But it was sponsored
by a couple of the aforementioned micro-labels and a bed &amp; breakfast to supplement
ticket sales enough to meet the expenses of producing it.
Why? <a href="http://thegatherings.org/82gather.html">Click the link</a> to see the stage setup and you might get an idea
of why it was expensive to put on.
And even though this was a sold-out show, this sort of music doesn&#8217;t exactly
support huge night-after-night audiences.
(We tried to get a similar concert series going in Pittsburgh, and practically
had to beg people and offer rides to get people into the seats. Clearly a large
and well-established series in Philadelphia is about enough for Pennsylvania.)</p>

<p>My point is that live revenues work well for some artists, but they aren&#8217;t going to
do it for everybody. Many musicians are still very interested in revenue streams
from selling recorded music; it&#8217;s not just the record labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.djehuti.com/2009/11/20/do-music-artists-fare-better-in-a-world-with-illegal-file-sharing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
